Wednesday, 15 June 2011

Audiology services develop improved pathways

Audiology services use Patient Experience to develop improved pathways


As part of the NHS Improvement organisation’s brief, Audiology pathways have come under review with the publication of a Shaping the Future of Audiology publication. The recommendations follow the usual review of any unnecessary steps and delays to improve throughput but also recognises the importance of continuously listening to patients. Services which involve pathways which can cross professional boundaries can particularly benefit from structured stage measurement of patient reported experience and outcome.


Measures can include not just satisfaction but also PROMS such as the Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). One of the problems with traditional experience and outcome measures is that when they are administered by staff, apart from the potential confidentiality and influence issues, measurement is fixed around visits. This leads to artificial and inaccurate results because the longer term impact is not measured. The best way of avoiding this is to use timed stage measurement so that patients, their carers and relatives can have their ultimate clinical outcomes and pathway experience followed up automatically after a given time period even if the patients have been referred on or been discharged.

Measurement is not just about questionnaires, departments involved in re-design have seen the value of patient focus groups, more extensive commentaries and patient stories.


Managing such programmes can be time consuming and therefore expensive but services such as the COM-Q service from CoMetrica can help achieve this easily.

This service has the added value of being tied into patient data and being able to generate patient specific measurement content which can use images and graphics so opens up measurement to children, those with learning disabilities and other communication impairment.

This article comes from the June edition of Outcomes published by Cometrica. The newsletter can be downloaded here

Transparency in Care quality

Is CQC annual assessment adequate to provide local assurance?

The recent Panorama documentary highlighted the appalling treatment of residents at Winterbourne View unit in Bristol and drew sharp criticism of the CQC’s failure to investigate. How reliant should we be on national bodies to ensure high standards are met in the delivery of care?


There is clearly a national role for regulation, registration and the setting of standards, but should we be reliant on annual inspections to provide assurance? There seem to three ways of monitoring of care quality currently: Self assessment by the organisations themselves based on local managers form filling, Annual inspections on an ad-hoc basis or in response to recognised concerns and whistleblowing which led to the panorama undercover investigation.


For care provider organisations, having continuous impartial assurance from residents and their families is a fundamental requirement often overlooked or only given cursory “annual resident survey” status. There is a need for continuous anonymous feedback from residents, relatives and staff to be an integral part of care provision. For information on how this can be achieved, contact Stuart Mathieson at CoMetrica on 07973 212306

This article comes from the June edition of Outcomes published by Cometrica. The newsletter can be downloaded here

NHS Future: Patient Involvement gets serious

NHS Future Forum reports


The Department of Health has published the report of the stocktake exercise on the governments plans for the future of the NHS.


While many spectators have focused on the recent apparent U-turns in policy ( such as slower speed of the establishment of commissioning boards, wider non-GP representation, the reduced role of Monitor as promoter of competition etc), the role of patients to be genuinely involved in decision making has been strengthened in the forum’s recommendations.

“ ‘no decision about me, without me’ must be hard‐wired into every part of the system “

The report recommends that shared decision making becomes a reality, replacing any tokenism or paternalism in patient involvement. Such decision making would be informed by transparent, public local commissioning plans based on evidence.

Better information about outcomes should be measured and made available and commissioners should require improved collection and use of outcomes & experience data at a local level.

“Clinicians said they wanted to have better access to accurate data about health outcomes so that they could benchmark outcomes and improve services”

Measuring and comparing outcomes should be a standard part of service provision, challenging provision based on custom & practice. This means that for all services provided, the clinical impact and experience, as perceived by patients and carers themselves,, should be measured and taken account of commissioning decisions.

Carers, Parents, Family involvement


In considering the effectiveness of care, the measurement of outcomes & experience needs to embrace a “whole systems” approach which can cross boundaries and takes account of the views of those who are caring for patients in their own environment.


This means that measuring experience cannot be achieved by a few patients being asked to “push a satisfaction button” on a screen while in clinic or hospital, but a structured system which allows relevant and focused questions to be answered by patients and their carers in an unpressured environment. Of particular importance are the patient stories and commentaries which are often so revealing in highlighting good and bad practice.


Other recent government announcements of significance in healthcare include David Cameron’s five promises “a continued real increase in NHS funding, retention of the 18 week maximum wait, not breaking up care, maintaining universal coverage and not ‘selling off’ the NHS”

This article comes from the June edition of Outcomes published by Cometrica. The newsletter can be downloaded here

The Future Forum report can be downloaded here